national
Federal appeals court overturns discrimination verdict
Rules discrimination not against law at time of claim
Published Thursday, 01-May-2008 in issue 1062
CHEYENNE, Wyo. (AP) – A federal appeals court in Denver has overturned a discrimination verdict that two lesbian former school administrators had won against a Sheridan County school district in 2006.
In a ruling handed down April 22, a panel of the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Kathleen Milligan-Hitt and Kathryn R. Roberts weren’t entitled to $160,000 that a Wyoming jury had awarded them as damages.
The appeals court ruling states that discriminating against homosexuals wasn’t clearly against the law in 2003, when both were passed over for employment as administrators in the Sheridan County School District No. 2.
The women and other administrators had been forced to apply for a limited number of available jobs when the school district consolidated schools in 2003. Neither Milligan-Hitt nor Roberts was rehired as an administrator and both now work for schools in Fremont County.
The women charged in their lawsuit that they lost their jobs after parents complained that the women had been seen holding hands at a store in Billings, Mont. They denied the incident, but said district superintendent Craig Dougherty confronted them angrily about it afterward.
Dougherty said he never expressed anger about the incident. He also denied discriminating against the two.
According to court records, a Wyoming jury in 2006 found that Dougherty had unconstitutionally discriminated against the two women, but the jury declined to award damages against him personally. The jury did order the school district to pay $112,000 to Roberts and $48,000 to Milligan-Hitt. The money was never paid because the case was appealed.
In the ruling, the appeals court stated that Dougherty wasn’t the final policymaker for the district, and so the district wasn’t responsible for his actions.
“We also conclude that in early 2003, the discrimination at issue here – on the basis of sexual orientation – was not clearly established to be unconstitutional,” the court ruling states. Dougherty was therefore immune from liability, the ruling states.
Greg Hacker, a Cheyenne lawyer representing Milligan-Hitt and Roberts, said that his clients were disappointed with the court decision. He said they and he regard it as an “unfortunate and unjust result.”
“The appellate court’s decision rests on what we would view as a legal hyper-technicality, really,” Hacker said.
Hacker said his clients haven’t made a decision about whether they intend to ask all the judges on the federal appeals court to grant them another hearing on the case.
Hacker said his clients brought the lawsuit to “vindicate their rights and expose the discrimination that had taken place.” Even though the appeals court ruling overturned the monetary award, he said that his clients felt they accomplished their goals.
Hacker said Milligan-Hitt and Roberts remain together. “If anything, this experience has brought them closer together,” he said.
Lawyer Kendal R. Hoopes of Sheridan, who represented the school district and Dougherty, said his clients were pleased with the decision.
“It reaffirms what the district’s position has been throughout the case, that there wasn’t any discrimination,” he said.
E-mail

Send the story “Federal appeals court overturns discrimination verdict”

Recipient's e-mail: 
Your e-mail: 
Additional note: 
(optional) 
E-mail Story     Print Print Story     Share Bookmark & Share Story
Classifieds Place a Classified Ad Business Directory Real Estate
Contact Advertise About GLT