photo
commentary
Quote UnQuote
Published Thursday, 27-Nov-2008 in issue 1092
“Right-wing forces led by the Mormon Church poured tens of millions of dollars into the campaign for Proposition 8 – a measure to enshrine bigotry in the state’s Constitution by preventing people of the same sex from marrying. The measure was designed to overturn May’s State Supreme Court decision, which made California the second state to end that exclusion of same-sex couples. … Apart from creating legal uncertainty about the thousands of same-sex marriages that have been performed in California and giving rise to lawsuits challenging whether the rules governing ballot measures were properly followed, the immediate impact of Tuesday’s rights-shredding exercise is to underscore the danger of allowing the ballot box to be used to take away people’s fundamental rights.”
New York Times editorial, Nov. 6.
“Conventional wisdom maintains that the hide-the-gays strategy (employed by the No On Prop 8 campaign) was good politics, but a) it insulted voters’ intelligence on an issue that was not hard to understand b) it seemed desperate c) it suggested that gay marriage is, in fact, something to be ashamed of instead of an extension of normal family life and, of course, d) it didn’t work.”
Virginia Postrell, contributing editor for The Atlantic and columnist for Forbes, on her blog, Nov. 6.
“(A) big chunk of blame for (Proposition) 8’s passage has to go to the No on 8 campaign’s initial arrogance, followed by their utterly limp reaction when the Yes campaign started attacking and gaining real steam. As one of my politically savvy Chronicle colleagues put it, ‘No on 8 was a bad campaign. Bad, bad, bad. Inept, amateurish, incompetent and, above all, guilty of committing the first and worst sin of politics: taking the voters for granted.’”
San Francisco Chronicle columnist Mark Morford, Nov. 5.
“We’re (David Furnish and I) not married. Let’s get that right. We have a civil partnership. What is wrong with Proposition 8 is that they went for marriage. Marriage is going to put a lot of people off, the word marriage. I don’t want to be married. I’m very happy with a civil partnership. If gay people want to get married, or get together, they should have a civil partnership. The word marriage, I think, puts a lot of people off. You get the same equal rights that we do when we have a civil partnership. Heterosexual people get married. We can have civil partnerships.”
Elton John to USA Today, Nov. 12.
“Gay people generally aren’t the placard-waving, bomb-throwing, chaps-wearing, communion-wafer-stomping radicals we’re made out to be by the Bills O’Reilly and Donohue. Most gays and lesbians are content to be left alone; many gays and lesbians go out of their way to ignore political threats and political activism and political activists. Only when gays and lesbians are attacked – only after the fact – do gays and lesbians take to the streets. Remember: the Stonewall Riots were a response to a particularly brutal and cruelly timed (we’d just buried Judy!) police raid on a gay bar in New York City; ACT-UP and Queer Nation were a response not to the AIDS virus, but to a murderous indifference on the parts of the political and medical establishment that amounted to an attack. Most gay people grow up desperately trying to pass, to blend in; most of us flee to cities where we can live our lives in relative peace and security. We don’t go looking for fights. … But once you get bashed, once someone else throws the first punch, then you fight back – what other choice do you have?”
Gay writer and national-TV talking-head Dan Savage, writing on his blog about the huge protests against Proposition 8, Nov. 12.
E-mail

Send the story “Quote UnQuote”

Recipient's e-mail: 
Your e-mail: 
Additional note: 
(optional) 
E-mail Story     Print Print Story     Share Bookmark & Share Story
Classifieds Place a Classified Ad Business Directory Real Estate
Contact Advertise About GLT