-
- Married couples in Mass. sue U.S. for federal benefits
- Calif. Legislature supports same-sex marriage challenge
- Obama consults advisers on military gay ban
- Dobson resigns as chair of Focus on the Family
- Wisconsin governor proposes same-sex partnerships
- Two cases of HIV in newborns
- National News Briefs
- World News Briefs
national
Calif. Legislature supports same-sex marriage challenge
Leno equates battle to fight for racial equality decades ago
Published Thursday, 05-Mar-2009 in issue 1106
SACRAMENTO (AP) – Both houses of the state Legislature passed resolutions Monday endorsing the legal effort to overturn California’s same-sex marriage ban, just days before the issue went to the state Supreme Court.
The resolutions passed along party lines, 18-14 in the Senate and 45-27 in the Assembly, with several members absent in both chambers.
Supporters of the resolutions said Proposition 8 should not have been placed on the November ballot through the initiative process. They said it represented a revision to the California Constitution because it stripped away existing rights and argue that only the Legislature can place such revisions before voters.
“We’re talking about a radical revision to our Constitution,” said Sen. Mark Leno, the San Francisco Democrat who sponsored the Senate resolution. “Do we have a constitutional democracy in California or do we have mob rule, where a majority of Californians can change the Constitution at any time?”
He equated it to the fight for racial equality decades ago. He noted that in 1964, voters overwhelmingly approved a measure that would have allowed landlords to discriminate against renters based on race.
Proposition 8 passed with 52 percent of the vote. By amending the state Constitution, it overturned a California Supreme Court decision last year that legalized same-sex marriage. It was the second time California voters have said marriage should be between a man and a woman.
Between the Supreme Court’s decision last spring and the November election, about 18,000 same-sex couples married.
The Supreme Court has scheduled oral arguments for Thursday on lawsuits that seek to overturn Proposition 8. The lawsuits argue that the initiative was enacted improperly and is itself unconstitutional because it singles out a minority group for discrimination.
Opponents said the initiative was a constitutional amendment and properly placed on the ballot.
“Voters did speak,” said Sen. George Runner, R-Lancaster, who opposed the measure. “They spoke from their hearts, from their minds. And for me, I’ve got to respect that.”
Assemblymember Chuck DeVore, R-Irvine, also opposed the resolution, saying it would send the state down a slippery slope. If the state allows same-sex marriage, DeVore said, it would have to allow polygamy because it could be argued as a First Amendment right.
“If you proceed down this path, you will open Pandora’s box,” he said.
The resolutions merely express the intent of the Legislature – in this case to support the legal arguments against Proposition 8.
|
|
Copyright © 2003-2025 Uptown Publications
