national
N.H. same-sex marriage panel sharply divided
Commission’s minority accuses majority of failing to address mandate
Published Thursday, 29-Dec-2005 in issue 940
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) – A study commission concluded in tumultuous fashion, with the minority accusing the majority of giving no meaningful consideration to extending legal recognition to gay and lesbian couples in New Hampshire.
That happened because most commission members were lawmakers and activists opposed to same-sex marriage, according to a minority report by four of the 15 commission members and the one alternate member.
“We in the minority believe that the majority report evidences nearly a complete failure to address the commission’s mandate,” said the minority report, which supported same-sex marriage or civil unions for same-sex couples.
The majority report recommended against same-sex marriage or civil unions and recommended amending the New Hampshire Constitution to limit marriage to unions between one man and one woman.
The majority said same-sex marriage is not a civil rights issue, that homosexuality is a choice because no “gay gene” exists, and that more study is needed before New Hampshire allows adoption for same-sex couples. Gays and lesbians can adopt in New Hampshire, but only as single parents.
The majority recommended more flexibility in hospital visitation rules for same-sex couples, however, and recognizing parental rights of out-of-state couples. And some members recommended a Hawaii-style reciprocal benefits system for spousal and next-of-kin relationships.
Created last year, the commission was ordered to study the legal implications of allowing same-sex marriage, civil unions or other options. During months of work, the panel collected testimony from the public and experts, including a pediatrician, psychologists, and a man who said he used to be gay but was no longer.
Along the way, commission members also scuffled over work delays, appointees to the panel and procedures.
“In part, the majority accomplished so little because the commission sought more to put gay people on trial than to consider the full scope of policy issues before it. Throughout its proceedings, the majority forced the commission to plod through antiquated and demonizing debates about whether gay men and lesbians are psychologically stable, transmit disease through acts of sexual intimacy, or are biologically aberrant,” according to the minority report.
Clashes continued during a press conference to announce the submission of the reports to the governor and Legislature when alternate member Steve Vaillancourt, R-Manchester, grabbed the microphone and lambasted the majority.
Rep. Tony Soltani, R-Epsom, the chair, quickly struck back.
“I was disappointed by the minority report … the minority report attacks the individual members of the majority,” Soltani said. “I would be embarrassed to submit that,” he said.
Soltani also accused an Associated Press reporter of bias and misquoting him and others in earlier stories. He gave no specifics. Joe Magruder, the AP’s news editor in Concord, said the coverage has been fair and accurate.
In addition to Vaillancourt, the alternate, the minority consisted of state Sen. Martha Fuller Clark, D-Portsmouth, Rep. James MacKay, R-Concord, former Rep. Raymond Buckley, a Democrat, and public appointee Ed Butler, a board member of New Hampshire Freedom to Marry.
E-mail

Send the story “N.H. same-sex marriage panel sharply divided”

Recipient's e-mail: 
Your e-mail: 
Additional note: 
(optional) 
E-mail Story     Print Print Story     Share Bookmark & Share Story
Classifieds Place a Classified Ad Business Directory Real Estate
Contact Advertise About GLT