A mob of men, women, teens and children surrounded a pharmacy in Kingston, Jamaica, Feb. 14 and demanded that four gay men inside come out and face punishment for being homosexuals.

The crowd formed after another shopper took exception to the men’s presence and began screaming that “battymen,” or faggots, must be killed.

Police eventually rescued the men, three of whom “had bleached-out faces” and were “dressed in tight jeans pants and skimpy shirts,” the Jamaica Observer reported. The officers had to fire tear gas into the crowd of 200 to clear an exit path.

One of the gay men was hit in the head with a rock while being escorted to a police vehicle.

“Unu can come save them nasty boy yah? Them boy yah fi go down,” one member of the mob shouted at police, the Observer said. The statement means the men must be burned to death.

After rescuing the men, the police officers disparaged them en route to, and at, the police station, according to a statement from the Jamaica Forum for Lesbians, All-Sexuals and Gays.

“While in the vehicle, all the way to the police station, the men were taunted by the police with anti-gay epithets,” J-FLAG said. “The insults continued even when the men arrived at the Half-Way Tree police station, where other police joined in the name-calling. The policemen at the station told them that they should be grateful and warned them never to return to Half-Way Tree.”

The fourth gay man in the store, J-FLAG leader Gareth Williams, said police slapped him, hit him in the head and struck him in the stomach with a rifle.

Jamaica, which seemingly has one of the world’s most overtly anti-gay populations, punishes gay sex with up to nine years in prison.

“Citizens perceived to be gay remain vulnerable to attacks both from violent members of the public as well as from the security forces,” J-FLAG said.

The Women Affairs and Youth Committee of Nigeria’s House of Representatives held a hearing Feb. 14 on an extreme anti-gay bill that some activists had believed was not going to see any action.

The measure, which bans same-sex marriage and same-sex relationships, also seems to outlaw such things as belonging to a gay group, visiting a gay Internet site and socializing between gay people.

The bill states, in part: “Publicity, procession and public show of same-sex amorous relationship through the electronic or print media physically, directly, indirectly or otherwise are prohibited in Nigeria.

“Any person who is involved in the registration of gay clubs, societies and organizations, sustenance, procession or meetings, publicity and public show of same- sex amorous relationship directly or indirectly in public and in private is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a term of five years imprisonment.”

The National Assembly is now expected to pass the bill, in some form, before April’s general election.

According to Scott Long from Human Rights Watch’s GLBT program: “The most useful form of outside pressure is from governments, in the form of statements by foreign embassies in Abuja or demarches at the ministerial level. Support to get those governments to take a stand would be vital.”

As recently as late January, leading activist Dorothy Aken’Ova of the Nigerian organization INCRESE, or International Centre for Reproductive Health and Sexual Rights, had considered the bill dead and had strongly urged reporters not to write anything about it for fear news items could rekindle legislators’ interest in the measure.

“[T]he bill is more or less dead because there is pandemonium [in advance of] the elections coming up in March/April and the swearing-in for a new government – we hope – in May,” she said in an e-mail interview. “Now they have found enemies within themselves and are not looking for gays, etc., to lead to the slaughter. If this remains the situation … then the bill is dead in all practical terms.

“[P]ress attention to the bill, even if it is as mild as reporting that it is presumed dead as a result of political tension … will be dangerous. Right now, we want silence,” Aken’Ova said.

Some other local activists had a different take in late January, just prior to the bill’s resurrection.

“Silence does not equate the death of the bill,” Alimi Adebisi Ademola, executive director of the gay youth group The Independent Project, said in an interview. “We believe strongly that the bill is still alive, only going through a process that no one knows.”

Davis Mac-Iyalla, director of the GLBT Christian organization Changing Attitude Nigeria, concurred, “Just because the House has been silent about the bill does not make it dead.”

Leo Igwe, executive secretary of the Nigerian Humanist Movement, had urged that international activism against the bill not stop “even though the ‘general feeling’ now is that any call for public action might be counterproductive unless there are indications that the legislation might be passed in weeks.”

Aken’Ova, the Nigerian gay group Alliance Rights, Human Rights Watch, the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission and others have suggested that British activist Peter Tatchell of the GLBT rights group OutRage! may be to blame for the bill’s resurrection.

They say OutRage! launched a new international action against the bill in January without seeking input from leading Nigerian activists who were calling for a “be silent” approach.

“Launching a global call to action without consulting the range of activists in Nigeria is irresponsible and insulting,” HRW’s Long said.

“Anybody who is proposing mass public action needs to check their stuff,” said Cary Alan Johnson, IGLHRC’s senior specialist for Africa. “[OutRage!’s] not taking responsibility for not having checked in with folks both in the U.S. and Nigeria bugged me – and I’ve witnessed similar kinds of disregard for local activists in Uganda and elsewhere.”

In a Jan. 31 “Public Statement of Warning,” Aken’Ova and 19 other African activists declared: “Until OutRage!’s action was issued, the bill was dead. By calling on people to begin a campaign at this stage, interest could be awakened in the bill. OutRage! is acting irresponsibly and in direct contradiction to the advice of leaders of the Nigerian LGBTI movement.”

In an interview, Tatchell responded that his group “acted in good faith” and noted that he suspended the action four days later, after learning that some Nigerian activists were counseling silence on the matter.

He also said some African GLBT groups disparage OutRage! because they “resent the fact that we also work with other groups that they see as rivals. They want exclusive control.”

“This vendetta is an attempt by certain groups to maintain their dominance and exclude other gay campaigners,” Tatchell said.

OutRage! members also said the Public Statement of Warning against OutRage!, rather than OutRage!’s call for action against the bill, could have been the catalyst for the House of Representatives’ renewed activity on the measure.

The public statement denouncing Tatchell for speaking out generated several media reports in the United Kingdom.

Speaking at a National Forum On Europe meeting in Ireland on Feb. 20, Polish President Lech Kaczynski warned that if homosexuality “were to be promoted on a grand scale, the human race would disappear.”

“Imagine what grand changes would occur in morés if the traditional links between men and women were set aside,” he said.

Reports said others in attendance gasped at the remarks.

Kaczynski, who banned the Pride parade in 2004 and 2005 when he was mayor of Warsaw, said he’d do it again if he were mayor today.

“This is a tendency, an orientation, that has always existed. I don’t know why,” he said. “I do not intend to combat it, to force them into therapy. But at the same time, I don’t think it’s appropriate that they should promote their sexual orientation.”

Openly gay Irish Senator David Norris called Kaczynski’s comments “ignorant, unsophisticated … a disgrace” and representative of “his very limited intelligence.”

Dublin Mayor Vincent Jackson said Kaczynski’s “beliefs are of a bygone age.”

Malta’s Civil Court ordered the Public Registry to issue marriage banns (an announcement of a proposed marriage) for a post-operative transsexual woman, the Times of Malta reported Feb. 16.

Justice Gino Camilleri said a union between the woman and her male partner would not violate the nation’s Marriage Act.

He also told the registry to change the woman’s gender designation in other official documents.

France’s top appeals court refused Feb. 20 to let a lesbian adopt her partner’s biological child.

The court said such an adoption is possible only within a marriage.

Same-sex couples are not allowed to marry in France, although they can enter civil unions.

Adoption outside of a marriage requires the biological parent or parents to relinquish their parental authority, the court said.

Assistance: Bill Kelley